Why I’m excited about the upcoming Canon 7D

8689636.jpgOkay, it’s still a rumor, the magic press conference isn’t supposed to happen until Sep/1 but from what we’ve seen popping up here and there, the 7D seems to be a real possibility.

At the same time I see a lot of “What? No full frame??!” popping up on various sources. But if you detach yourself from the thought that this has to be a Canon 5D Mk II replacement (too early!) and if you take into account the current economy (Photographers looking at alternatives to the big bodies), and if take apart the alleged key specs of that camera, things start to become a bit more interesting.

Rumor 1: 18MP APS-C

Aaaah, lots of pixels (but not quite 21MP as the 5D MkII) and a 1.6 crop sensor. Makes sense to not pack 21 million pixels on a smaller sensor. I expect the pixel density to be similar to that of the 5D Mk II and they’ve got that covered pretty well. Why is the 1.6 crop sensor good? Because it serves a bunch of different crowds. A 1.6 crop will give you more performance in the telephoto range. A 300mm lens will behave as if it was 480mm long. Wildlife anyone? Or sports? And the big ISO range of up to 3200 (or even up to 6400 and 12800, even though I don’t expect that to be too usable) is going to allow those long (and not too bright) lenses to be used in more situations. Also imagine the wedding photographer who will have to switch back and forth between wide angle and telephoto a lot. Back in the day of film they simply had two bodies, one with a telephoto lens and one with a wide angle and all was good. If you already own a 5D or a 5D Mk II that you use more in the wide angle range, the 7D will make an ideal companion for it. It’s not too heavy to carry around (I expect the form factor to be similar to that of the 5D Mk II) and you can use it to squeeze quite a bit more focal length out of your long lenses.

Rumor 2: Dual DIGIC 4

Yess. Faster processing. If we can believe the rumors, this will allow for 8 frames per second. If you’re a sports shooter, this will make you happy. Especially as you won’t have to shell out as big as you would’ve had to pay for a 1D MkIII, which admittedly is even faster, but will most likely still be way more expensive too.

Rumor 3: 19 cross AF sensors

19 cross type sensors means more effective Servo AF, e.g. better tracking of moving targets. Sports photography anyone?

If any of those rumors are true, I believe Canon will have a very exciting camera in their portfolio that has a lot to offer to a lot of people. Let’s wait and see what Sep/1 will actually bring.

(Rumored specs and pic via canonrumors.com)

Update: typos fixed

tfttf339 – ASA vs. ISO

3298033592_a157066ca9_m.jpgAre ASA and ISO the same? Is digital really that much more scary than film?

Who is Juliana from Australia? Or Kelvin from Hongkong? Or Jay Williams? Make your voice heard on the show and tell everyone where you live. Send an MP3 to [email protected] or call the voice mail line: US: 206-202-3757 – Intl.: +44-7005-805-742

Show Links:

» Download the MP3 for this episode

» Get the show for free in iTunes
» Get the show for free using RSS

tfttf332 – They Come in Threes – Tech Guy

techguy_tfttf_logo2.jpgShutter speed – aperture – ISO determine exposure, Subject distance – aperture – focal length determine depth of field. Leo and Chris discuss those two very important relationships in photography.

Show Links:

» Download the MP3 for this episode

» Get the show for free in iTunes
» Get the show for free using RSS

My Lightroom Workflow – pt. 7 – Noise and Mimicry

details.jpgAfter showing you how for high-ISO shots today’s cameras rely more and more on noise reduction, no matter if it’s done in-camera, or in post processing by the camera manufacturer’s RAW development software such as Capture NX or DPP and after explaining how to save ISO-dependent development settings in Lightroom, one question is still open:

How do we make Lightroom mimic as close as possible what the manufacturers do in that respect?

Or even more important, let’s first have a look at what they actually do when reducing noise. I don’t have in-depth knowledge of any of the camera manufacturer’s specifics or how Lightroom exactly does it, but based on what I’m seeing with my own eyes and based on my knowledge about noise reduction, the least I can do is try a sophisticated guess.

Continue reading “My Lightroom Workflow – pt. 7 – Noise and Mimicry”

My Lightroom Workflow pt. 6 – Independent Development

After receiving a ton of great feedback on the last article in this Lightroom Workflow series, I decided to take some time over the weekend and quickly go over one more important piece in the puzzle: ISO/camera dependent development settings.

lrprefs.jpgWhy would you want to do such a thing? Simple. Let’s say you’re totally happy how Lightroom treats the pictures from your camera on all ISO levels up to 800, but starting from ISO 1600 you need that slight tad more noise reduction on all images. But just up there, all other images should be left alone. Or imagine you have two cameras, a DSLR and a point-and-shoot, and you import pictures from both cameras into Lightroom, but they both have very different noise characteristics, so you want to treat their respective images in a different way.

Continue reading “My Lightroom Workflow pt. 6 – Independent Development”